FANDOM


(Re. Rorek - who removed this version, without explanation? nothing's wrong with it...)
 
Line 20: Line 20:
 
==Re. Rorek - who removed this version, without explanation? nothing's wrong with it...==
 
==Re. Rorek - who removed this version, without explanation? nothing's wrong with it...==
 
In a certain way, there'' is'' something wrong with your description: too many superfluous details, descriptions as if copied from the episode's script ... An encyclopedic description requires brief and down-to-the-bottom facts, or you might otherwise just as well write down Rorek's lines from the episode's script word by word. Besides, the (real) Rorek had too little an appearance to explore the full extend of his arcane powers, and the rest of your description actually conforms to the dragon [[Malchior]] when he impersonated Rorek.
 
In a certain way, there'' is'' something wrong with your description: too many superfluous details, descriptions as if copied from the episode's script ... An encyclopedic description requires brief and down-to-the-bottom facts, or you might otherwise just as well write down Rorek's lines from the episode's script word by word. Besides, the (real) Rorek had too little an appearance to explore the full extend of his arcane powers, and the rest of your description actually conforms to the dragon [[Malchior]] when he impersonated Rorek.
  +
  +
Hey, Daniel. I'm Ralnon, an administrator and bureaucrat of this wiki. No, Daniel, I really don't think there is anything wrong about it and I don't see why you reverted the edits of Rorek33 back to your preferred edit. Can't you respect the wishes of the larger community? There's no problem at all with details; me and three other users have tried to revert it, but you just changed it back without explanation. Actually, I have to disagree: An encyclopedia gives you extensive and detailed explanations about any particular given topic. Wikipedia is for down-to-the-bottom facts; Wikia is not. Please, seriously, stop the constant edit-warring, Daniel. [[User:Ralnon|Ralnon]] ([[User talk:Ralnon|talk]]) 01:00, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:00, July 22, 2010

Welcome to the Teen Titans Wiki
Wiki

The Teen Titans Wiki is the wiki all about the animated cartoon network series Teen Titans!

Here are some links to get you started:

  • Recent changes allows you to view any new or recent activity done on the wiki.
  • Random page allows you to view a randomly selected article from the wiki.
  • Questions? If you have any questions feel free to leave a message on the Help desk or on the talk page associated with each article, or you can send a message to anyone's talk page.
  • Need Help? Then it is suggested that you visit the Community Portal. It has an outline of the site, and pages to help you learn how to edit.
  • Make sure to log in every time you edit, so that we can recognize you!

Good luck! We hope to see great things from you in the future!

Re. Rorek - who removed this version, without explanation? nothing's wrong with it...Edit

In a certain way, there is something wrong with your description: too many superfluous details, descriptions as if copied from the episode's script ... An encyclopedic description requires brief and down-to-the-bottom facts, or you might otherwise just as well write down Rorek's lines from the episode's script word by word. Besides, the (real) Rorek had too little an appearance to explore the full extend of his arcane powers, and the rest of your description actually conforms to the dragon Malchior when he impersonated Rorek.

Hey, Daniel. I'm Ralnon, an administrator and bureaucrat of this wiki. No, Daniel, I really don't think there is anything wrong about it and I don't see why you reverted the edits of Rorek33 back to your preferred edit. Can't you respect the wishes of the larger community? There's no problem at all with details; me and three other users have tried to revert it, but you just changed it back without explanation. Actually, I have to disagree: An encyclopedia gives you extensive and detailed explanations about any particular given topic. Wikipedia is for down-to-the-bottom facts; Wikia is not. Please, seriously, stop the constant edit-warring, Daniel. Ralnon (talk) 01:00, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.